Moderator: Moderators

jon_12091 wrote:All I get from Ploughboy's contribution to the debate is the smell of a belief in 'total depravity' and possibly a whiff of 'hyper-calvinism'.
The timing of this article seems a little coincidental -
http://www.answersingenesis.org/article ... ible-peace
We come across Ploughboy's type of hyper-Calvinism before, Peter. Our wonderful pal David Anderson. Nasty pieces of work who think everyone else is just as nasty as well. If you think everyone else is a nasty piece of work, that's exactly how you end up. Sadly, in the USA, such hyper Calvinism appears to be a strong element in the death cult nature of much of the fundamentalist movement. It probably is why David Anderson takes his pleasure in solitary pursuits such as running and married below his intellect.Peter Henderson wrote:jon_12091 wrote:All I get from Ploughboy's contribution to the debate is the smell of a belief in 'total depravity' and possibly a whiff of 'hyper-calvinism'.
The timing of this article seems a little coincidental -
http://www.answersingenesis.org/article ... ible-peace
Indeed Jon,
I've tackled him more than once on his beliefs about babies that die, the still born, aborted fetuses, or people like my son who have very severe learning delays (10 and absolutely no speach at all yet). Seems that humans who fall into these catagories recieve the same condemnation as the vilest of serial killers. That's not what I was told in evangelical circles, and I know of no churches that teach things like this, except for the very extreme (I wonder what Marc thinks on this subject ?)
Michael wrote:Has Anderson's wife got an IQ in single figures then?
According to strict, atheist Darwinism, the purpose of life is to reproduce

jon_12091 wrote:So he's a nominal, big surprise, but he talks about Darwinism almost exclusively in a social sense and in terms that frankly I hear mostly issuing from the mouths of creationists..According to strict, atheist Darwinism, the purpose of life is to reproduce
Though it clearly damns him as a Darwinist!
Apparently Melanie Phillips gets quoted in his manifesto!

jon_12091 wrote:Having now had a look at some of Breivik's ramblings there is an awful lot social conservatism that many creationists would buy into - and he clearly drank deeply from the same well of far right propaganda and paranoid delusion as more than a few creationists (Eurabia can be found under Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories, which says it all really).
I said something would turn up on FSTDT...
http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=82829
And Ken's there this month as well
http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=82275
Roger Stanyard wrote:jon_12091 wrote:Having now had a look at some of Breivik's ramblings there is an awful lot social conservatism that many creationists would buy into - and he clearly drank deeply from the same well of far right propaganda and paranoid delusion as more than a few creationists (Eurabia can be found under Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories, which says it all really).
I said something would turn up on FSTDT...
http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=82829
And Ken's there this month as well
http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=82275
The hard conservative political right isn't having much luck this month. Firstly, Murdoch and News Corporation have lost all credibility for ever. Rotten to the core and criminal. Secondly, Breivik advertises the conservatives as murderous and unhinged, in the worst light possible for them. You may also see, in coming days, the Teabaggers force the USA into bankruptcy in their paranoid pursuit of power. Then we all are up the proverbial creek without a paddle.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest