http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2016/12 ... -news.html
[The hands at the Darwin Ranch over yonder at Deception Pass are getting a mite consternated. They're losing their grip on public sentiment, credible evidence, and even on reality. (The failure of "Lucy" made matters quite a bit worse for them.) To keep the funding coming in, they whip their ponies of persuasive propaganda into a gallop and commence to presenting strong evidence for evolution — or so they think. What really happens is that we get a passel of speculations, assertions, guesswork, bad reasoning, and the like that are passed off as real science. But their devotion to Darwin is unflagging.]
The failure of 'Lucy' is a Sorensen FANTASY. Another one.
There is no such thing. What there is is that she (her species) was a transitional form between the last common ancestor of today's great apes and our species[, and 'us' today]. Which was around around 3 million years ago in Africa. And which climbed trees as well as walking bipedally on the ground, though perhaps more clumsily than we do, and is unlikely to have knuckle-walked despite what many creationists still like to claim regarding Australopithecus afarensis.
Ah, but Sorensen wrote an earlier blog on 17 December declaring in effect that Lucy was somehow falling as evidence for evolution because she spent time in trees (before one of the species physically fell from that tree she was in), that 'evolutionists' have been having a terrible time of it and are depressed because their theory is on the rocks, and that he (he's modest with [it] don't you know) was providing Christians with a 'resource' - against evil reality as uncovered by the scientific method presumably.
As well as lying, Sorensen deliberately shuts his eyes and his brain whenever truth that he does not like is presented (he refuses to engage with it but either pretends he never saw it or starts falsely calling the person who wrote it either a 'liar' or some kind of stupid fool using very bad reasoning or false logic)...
Such as this (which I humbly present and am prepared to be taken to task over as you see fit though Sorensen who reads the BCSE community forum has once again ducked the challenge):viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3153&start=720
My post at 3.58 am on 19 December. Where I wrote:
"The fool Sorensen thinks evolutionists (including the Christians ones) are having a bad time of it currently .., or is trying to persuade himself that that is the case."
I was angered by Sorensen's hateful lie "Pretty desperate to promote lack of evidence as science ..." There is ample evidence that Australopithecus afarensis could and did walk bipedally (on the GROUND) as well as spending time up in trees. Sorensen is simply lying in claiming otherwise. I covered his post of 17 December in more detail previously:viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3153&start=705
(my post at 1.54 am on 19 Dec)
This man is a danger and a stumbling block to people who associate Christianity with light, salt, truth and love. A massive danger. (And a 'Godsend' to those who associate it with darkness, lies, intolerance, bigotry, reality-denial, divisiveness, arrogance, refusal to listen or to learn, closed-mindedness, underhand tactics in the face of intellectual opposition, and tribal hatred for people with different beliefs.)
And there are two lies (deliberate fantasies) for the price of one in this rant:
"Part of the problem is the secular science press (such as with the "dinosaur feather in amber" nonsense)".
Which has NOT been shown to be nonsense (ie a misidentified 'bird' presumably) at all (I mean by qualified scientists not sensationalist journalists):http://toddcwood.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12 ... nyway.html
(YEC Christian)http://scienceandcreation.blogspot.co.u ... amber.html
(non-YEC Christian; James Kidder is not copied in as he asked not to receive emails either from Sorensen or from me about Sorensen)
The man Sorensen is an utter disgrace. You will recall that I have labelled him 'evil'. The cap fits.
He will never engage with this message (when he reads it at the BCSE forum). He will either ignore it and carry on as before, quote-mine me to suit his agenda, or call me a 'liar' etc etc and say I am 'incapable of logic' (because I am not a young earth creationist Christian).
Or perhaps even all three. (On HIS highly censored pages of course - not on the BCSE forum where direct interactions take place.)