https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman/"How do I refute thee? Let me count the ways...
EDIT: A furious atheist shared this post and made a comment that proved me right. Again. He obviously did not read the post.
This graphic is a preview of the Featured Article for Saturday, October 21st. Anti-creationists try to "refute" us in several ways:
* Straw Man (nobody has to defend a position they don't hold, especially when words are put in our mouths)
* Misrepresentation (a form of straw man with a dishonest flair)
* Ad hominem attacks (the character and intelligence of individuals, creation science, God himself, the Bible, and so on; yer a st00pid dumb creotard for believing in that stuff and I'm smarter than you because atheism)
* Change the subject and attack (a variation on the red herring distraction), including hijacking a discussion thread
* Appeal to motive (just what it says; "you say/do this because...", but they do not have knowledge of someone's heart and mind)
These and more are discussed. Essentially, village atheists and anti-creationists on teh interwebs who go out as Darwin's Crusaders have the coherence and impact of a gorilla splashing in a wading pool. -CBB
https://giphy.com/gifs/13yTLNRFHC6Rri/html5"
(at 16.00 hours on 18 October)
https://www.facebook.com/TQEPDebunked/?hc_location=ufi"Yes, we're so unable to refute creationism that you have to vehemently block us at every turn.
Makes sense if you don't think about it."
(posted on 19 October - apparently Sorensen's 'EDIT' is reacting to this comment)
The EDIT is full of lies and malicious accusations. He made a comment that "proved me right". No he did NOT, liar. He highlighted your cowardice over defending your position to those outside your fanbase. "He obviously did not read the post." You don't know whether he read it or not (even if he did not re-post every word of it). Though not posting every word (people know where to go to read the original) did not stop this attack from Curtis Long against TQEPD:
"I see that Gutless didn't share the whole post. Let me help.
"How do I refute thee? Let me count the ways...
EDIT: A furious atheist shared this post and made a comment that proved me right. Again. He obviously did not read the post.
This graphic is a preview of the Featured Article for Saturday, October 21st. Anti-creationists try to "refute" us in several ways:
* Straw Man (nobody has to defend a position they don't hold, especially when words are put in our mouths)
* Misrepresentation (a form of straw man with a dishonest flair)
* Ad hominem attacks (the character and intelligence of individuals, creation science, God himself, the Bible, and so on; yer a st00pid dumb creotard for believing in that stuff and I'm smarter than you because atheism)
* Change the subject and attack (a variation on the red herring distraction), including hijacking a discussion thread
* Appeal to motive (just what it says; "you say/do this because...", but they do not have knowledge of someone's heart and mind)
These and more are discussed. Essentially, village atheists and anti-creationists on teh interwebs who go out as Darwin's Crusaders have the coherence and impact of a gorilla splashing in a wading pool. -CBB""
Well Long is an admirer of a hypocritical reflex liar who is an EXPERT on deliberate misrepresentation, Ad hominem insults and avoiding the subject. TQEPD points out that Sorensen blocks people at every turn despite them allegedly refuting creationism with as much skill as a gorilla splashing in a bath - and Sorensen attacks the comment WITHOUT quoting ANY of it. Typical cheating behaviour from this fraud.