TiS' fishy "science"

This forum is for the discussion of the evidence for evolution. Anyone is welcome to post, however, scripture is not allowed. As the title says, Science Only please!

Moderator: Moderators

TiS' fishy "science"

Postby Anonymous » Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:26 pm

I just love the way they think their reviews of science articles should count for anything instead of writing it up and submitting it to journals... http://www.truthinscience.org.uk/site/c ... ew/264/63/
Anonymous
 

Postby SamReno » Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:45 pm

yeah they've an updated part of it to includ "a new technical article on Tiktaalik which is found in the “Evidence for Evolution” section of this website. To read this report click here. The well-referenced article concludes with this summary... blah blah"

It appears that by referring to it as "technical" and "well-referenced" this creates an equivalence with the articles that appear in peer-reviewed mainstream or technical science journals.
It's funny how their technical and well-referenced criticisms don't manage to make it into any of these journals.
SamReno
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:43 am

Postby Brian Jordan » Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:58 pm

God-of-the-gaps again, full of non sequiturs. I wonder who they're getting to write this stuff? I'm going to ask over on RDF whether anyone recognises is.
"PPSIMMONS is an amorphous mass of stupid" - Rationalwiki
User avatar
Brian Jordan
Forum Admin
 
Posts: 4216
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:59 pm

Postby Brian Jordan » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:34 am

No recognition of the source or artist on the RDF forum, but a very robust response with a very good link.
http://tinyurl.com/4ku442 and http://lancelet.blogspot.com/2006/04/ai ... aalik.html
"PPSIMMONS is an amorphous mass of stupid" - Rationalwiki
User avatar
Brian Jordan
Forum Admin
 
Posts: 4216
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:59 pm


Return to Science Only

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron