Grand theory of evolution.

This forum is for the discussion of the evidence for evolution. Anyone is welcome to post, however, scripture is not allowed. As the title says, Science Only please!

Moderator: Moderators

Postby Michael » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:02 pm

Paulesq wrote:
Roger Stanyard wrote: Incoherent gibberish.


Come come Roger, lets examine the facts.

Fact, The word 'evolution' is Victorian slang for what Charles Darwin himself preferred to refer to as 'descent with modification by means of natural selection.

Fact, Science, mankind's artifacts also evolve by means of descent with modification and by means of human/intelligent selection.

Fact, Although both processes work on totally different materials in totally different domains it is perfectly reasonable to state that both life and science 'evolve' by process of a type of selection.

Fact. Natural Selection has advanced from the unconscious/subconscious state to consciously choosing.

With the understanding that 'evolution' can be observed as operating on two different levels A and B it is perfectly reasonable to assume that 'selection' began with the big bang and that Primal selection C is a reality.


Best ignored, away with the evolved fairies
Michael
 
Posts: 2786
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Lancaster

Postby Roger Stanyard » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:45 pm

Paulesq wrote:[.

Bugger off and grow up.
User avatar
Roger Stanyard
Forum Admin
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:59 pm

Postby Chris Sergeant » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:53 pm

You mention Lee Smolin, so you are perhaps aware of Quantum Gravity work suggesting the collapse of a previous universe. The resulting bounce being what we describe as the Big Bang & inflation. Hence the Big Bang is not the beginning as you seem to suggest.
I note that the uncertainty principle means that not all properties of the previous universe survive the collapse.
Chris Sergeant
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:26 pm

Postby Paulesq » Thu Feb 18, 2010 1:06 pm

Chris Sergeant wrote:You mention Lee Smolin, so you are perhaps aware of Quantum Gravity work suggesting the collapse of a previous universe. The resulting bounce being what we describe as the Big Bang & inflation. Hence the Big Bang is not the beginning as you seem to suggest.
I note that the uncertainty principle means that not all properties of the previous universe survive the collapse.


I have a pressing engagement, i must work.
I will reply to all questions later today if i am allowed.
Paulesq
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Salford England

Postby Paulesq » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:59 am

Posting deleted.
Paulesq
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Salford England

Postby Paulesq » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:58 pm

Posting deleted.
Paulesq
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Salford England

Postby Paulesq » Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:48 pm

Posting deleted.

As a moderator, it is my responsibility to police this forum against trolls. Nobody has the right to use this forum to troll or post off topic posts. It remains a privately owned forum.
Paulesq
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Salford England

Postby psiloiordinary » Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:06 pm

Paulesq,

You are banned for trolling.

Psi
User avatar
psiloiordinary
 
Posts: 798
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Yorkshire

Previous

Return to Science Only

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests