marcsurtees wrote:Roger Stanyard wrote:
I think there is some muddled thinking here. The creationists dismiss any and all evidence that contradicts their literal interpretation of the Bible. Marc Surtees, for example, is a proponent of this. Creationism is simply not evidence-based.
I have to disagree with Roger and agree with Oddbeaver on this one, the evidence is all around us and as far as biology is concerned fits perfectly with the idea that an intelligence designed it all.
But you've openly admitted to us that you dismiss all evidence that contradicts your personal opinions about religion.
Heck, you've even tried to wiggle your way out of the issue by claiming that your personal opinions on religion are not personal opinions at all. Presumably, you think they are facts.