Its been a hundred years since Arthur Holmes published his first 'date' beginning the use of radiometric dating.
http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/page9898.html
Moderator: Moderators
jon_12091 wrote:Eer' no - just poor sentence construction!
No doubt they'll get ace mathematician Dembski to extrapolate back to zero at 6000-whatever yago. The ramifications escape me - does it mean everything is speeding up, or slowing down? Or perhaps both?Michael wrote:Now it has aged more than that.
Holmes thought it was 1.7 by in 1911 and it's now 4.6 by
I wonder what Cathy's pal Marc says about this
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest