Answers in Genesis unable to interpret a (fake?) graph

This forum is for the discussion of the evidence for evolution. Anyone is welcome to post, however, scripture is not allowed. As the title says, Science Only please!

Moderator: Moderators

Answers in Genesis unable to interpret a (fake?) graph

Postby a_haworthroberts » Thu Mar 05, 2015 9:23 pm ... our-fault/
'No Correlation Between CO2 and Global Temperature'.

Apart from during the past 120 YEARS, that is.

This assumes that the AiG graph (NO direct source is cited though the article claims that Figure 2 depicts a comparison of "CO2 estimates of Etheridge with temperature estimates of Ljungqvist") is even accurate; I have read that the average atmospheric concentration of CO2 was believed to have been 290 ppm in 1900 (not around 1870 as this graph implies).

Answers in Genesis are compulsive science deniers - even when the science in question does not directly contradict the Bible.
Posts: 9075
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Return to Science Only

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests