Rabble rouser Ken Ham and his biased Facebook fans

Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

Moderator: Moderators

A fact that the liar Ken Ham never admits is true

Postby a_haworthroberts » Wed May 02, 2018 12:25 am

That humanity has recently altered the composition of Earth's atmosphere, mainly by burning fossil fuels, increasing the concentrations of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.

All we ever get from AiG is MISDIRECTION (and ridiculous attempts to link their misdirections to the BIBLE):
https://answersingenesis.org/environmen ... r-fiction/

Here's the latest stupidity from Ken Ham - trying to have a bit of a laugh at this article:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 124327.htm
https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken- ... ng-cities/
"And after reading the article, we find that the thought experiment is really all about the author’s views of climate change!"
Ham deliberately ignores what the Science Daily article says - "The researchers note that the emission of fossil fuels into the atmosphere has already changed the carbon cycle in a way that is recorded in carbon isotope records."

What Ken Ham calls 'answers' is simple bigotry. And this anti-science stance by the bigot makes a mockery that he is 'only' opposed to the findings of 'historical' science. This is 'observational'. And measurable.

Here's a link for the Unscientific Australian: https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... rmanently/

And maybe the dangerous bigot would care to google 'Thwaites Glacier'? But if he did he would doubtless find a justification for saying "there's nothing to worry about from global warming and melting glaciers, and we don't need the Paris Agreement - because despite human sin and natural processes, God is still in control of the 'perfect atmosphere' he created - just as I told everybody back in 2015
https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken- ... alarmists/".

I'm not attacking the Bible. I'm attacking Ken Ham for lies that have little or nothing to do with the Bible despite all his endless claims that what he continues push year on year is things "every Christian needs to know about climate change".


PS
And Ham's unscientific stance on global warming - he's basically saying the Bible tells us all we need to know regarding Earth's climate in 2018 (which is false) - proves that he was either lying or delusional when he wrote THIS:
https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken- ... -textbook/
It is clear that when it comes to RECENT and CURRENT climate change/global warming Ham DOES think the Bible is a science textbook (rather than merely a 'textbook of historical science'). It 'tells' Ham that global warming is 'not' anthropogenic but caused by God and/or natural processes - and that it requires little or no action to combat it and is nothing to worry about because, as he stated in his 2015 article, "humanity won’t be snuffed out by climate change" - so that's alright then, a few people might survive.

PPS
And there are even MORE lies ie DELIBERATE MISDIRECTION here (see what he claims about carbon dioxide):
https://answersingenesis.org/media/audi ... te-change/ "And, while carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, it is not really a significant one". (He tries to justify the lie by comparing carbon dioxide with water vapour.) If you're going to be a career liar you might as well make your lies big ones. (As much as 20 per cent of the greenhouse effect on Earth may be due to carbon dioxide and the gas persists in the atmosphere for many decades.)
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8418
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Rabble rouser Ken Ham and his biased Facebook fans

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sat May 05, 2018 1:07 am

Ken Ham advertising an article in Answers Magazine entitled 'Caves - Underground and Upside Down':
https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken- ... -magazine/

A description of this article - but you have to pay to subscribe to read any Answers Magazine article whereas 'browsing' from another link in the Ham blog only provides very limited information about what's in the magazine's latest edition - informs the reader that: "All our lives we’ve heard that caves form slowly, over tens of thousands of years, as surface water seeps into the earth. But recent discoveries are turning old assumptions upside down. The real story is much more interesting and consistent with the Bible":
https://answersingenesis.org/answers/magazine/

The article is not written by a geologist but by Mike Matthews, editor in chief of Answers Magazine:
https://answersingenesis.org/store/magazine/ (click under Table of Contents)

And this is his bio: https://answersingenesis.org/bios/mike-matthews/
"Mike Matthews earned a BA in English and an MEd in English education from Bob Jones University. Mike was content manager for the Creation Museum and now is the editor in chief of Answers magazine."

I've got a BA in French and German Studies from the University of Lancaster, England. And I once visited the nearby White Scar Caves. Maybe that qualifies me to write an article reporting 'discoveries' that turn upside down all trained scientists ever thought they knew about cave formation - and, into the bargain, find out what exactly the Bible teaches us about cave formation and then ensure that my discovery matches with that Bible teaching?

I would of course first have to recant what I wrote on 19 June 2017:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3815&p=51509&hilit=caves#p51509
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8418
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Rabble rouser Ken Ham (and his biased Twitter army)

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sat May 05, 2018 1:25 pm

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyat ... evolution/ (more than 200 hundred comments already)

Apparently AiG are still having difficulty filling all the job posts they've created (they didn't evolve) in Kentucky. Perhaps they should stop advertising for information officers? That didn't work out to well for the (Russian) Kremlin either. Talking of the Kremlin, a new auditorium is on the way - where people will be taught what really happened: https://twitter.com/aigkenham/status/958669086711537664
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8418
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Rabble rouser and LIAR Ken Ham

Postby a_haworthroberts » Thu May 10, 2018 11:50 pm

He's still aggressively pushing debunked pseudo-science about methods used to date past natural events and objects:
https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken- ... can-do-it/
"... Yet, because of their dating methods (which have continually been shown to be unreliable), evolutionists still refuse to accept that Neanderthals are simply a variety of human...".
Which in turn is pushing this from 2007:
https://answersingenesis.org/geology/ra ... th-is-old/

Ham lied TWICE on 10 May. Not only are the dating methods reliable, but there is abundant genetic and morphological evidence that WE are a separate species FROM Neanderthals (who went extinct while our species survived). We are related - there is evidence of inter-breeding (normally YECs would say we and Neanderthals were members of the same 'kind' - except when that invention becomes more grossly unbiblical than when they normally employ it to 'defend' Genesis and/or 'refute' science).

But liar Ken Ham doesn't give a toss about evidence.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8418
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Previous

Return to Conversations with Creationists

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron